Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

There is a "Blood Bath" coming 2010,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:06 PM
Original message
There is a "Blood Bath" coming 2010,
and it will make the one in 1994 look tame.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

"When given the choice between a Republican, and a Democrat who acts like a Republican, the voters will choose the Republican every time." ---Harry Truman

QED Massachusetts



Howard Dean stated on MSNBC that if the Democrats do NOT provide some immediate REAL relief like expanding Medicare to 55 BEFORE the elections, we could possibly lose The House.

There will be NO "Fixing it Later".
There will be NO "adding a Public Option later."
Even if The Democrats are successful at adding some "regulations" to this Health Care Bill to make it seem more palatable,
they will simply be De-Regulated after the Blood Bath.
THAT is what Republicans and "Centrist" Democrats do....De-Regulate.
(SEE: NAFTA, repeal of Glass-Steagal)

We are going to be forced to live with the FOUNDATION of this Bill for a LONG time,
and that FOUNDATION is:
Mandatory Profits for the Health Insurance Industry.
Every American WILL be forced to contribute to these profits,
AND America WILL blame the Democratic Party.
Rightly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   K&R  G_j   Mar-08-10 06:08 PM   #1 
   ditto.  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-08-10 06:12 PM   #3 
   Sadly  liberalmike27   Mar-09-10 01:52 AM   #111 
   K&R  amborin   Mar-08-10 06:12 PM   #2 
   Somebody read that to Obama. Quick.  Jakes Progress   Mar-08-10 06:13 PM   #4 
   He knows...  Son Of Wendigo   Mar-09-10 04:27 AM   #147 
   The cynic in me  customerserviceguy   Mar-09-10 08:20 AM   #176 
   smelly repug ass  saigon68   Mar-09-10 05:33 PM   #270 
      agreed  cutlassmama   Mar-09-10 05:54 PM   #273 
   He cares.  PoliticalOne65   Mar-09-10 04:54 AM   #148 
      Left wing? There is only Dennis and one or two there, everyone else is talk Left-vote Corporate  pundaint   Mar-09-10 05:35 AM   #153 
         updating whipcongress list, willing to cut these ones a lil slack  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:14 AM   #162 
         You apparently arent part of the left wing of the Party, so what do you support that  rhett o rick   Mar-09-10 03:15 PM   #247 
   K & R  democrank   Mar-08-10 06:18 PM   #5 
   k&r n/t  Joe the Liberal   Mar-08-10 06:26 PM   #6 
   Kick and Rec. NT  Mike 03   Mar-08-10 06:28 PM   #7 
   It is amazing how things changed so fast. The Democrats in Congress are weaklings. nt  AlinPA   Mar-08-10 06:31 PM   #8 
   Not weaklings -- just antiquated  FarCenter   Mar-08-10 06:38 PM   #9 
   Not weaklings, not antiquated  jgraz   Mar-08-10 06:56 PM   #10 
   Correct!  Individualist   Mar-08-10 07:03 PM   #12 
   complicity begets weakness  G_j   Mar-08-10 07:06 PM   #14 
   +1 nt  laughingliberal   Mar-08-10 09:26 PM   #28 
   That's it exactly  MissDeeds   Mar-08-10 09:39 PM   #32 
   absolutely  faithnotgreed   Mar-08-10 10:40 PM   #43 
   Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-09-10 01:15 AM   #91 
   Calling your fellow DU'ers T-Baggers is pathetic, even moronic.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:26 AM   #100 
      I called no one a T baggers, just made sure they are saying the same thing  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:55 AM   #112 
         .  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 02:01 AM   #116 
   TERRIFIED OF THE REPUBLICAN SLIME MACHINES  HowHasItComeToThis   Mar-09-10 01:18 AM   #93 
   You beat me to it!  tavalon   Mar-09-10 02:41 AM   #122 
   +1  Enthusiast   Mar-09-10 02:52 AM   #126 
   They are indeed complicit  peace frog   Mar-09-10 07:46 AM   #170 
   I will say it in a more working class way  reggie the dog   Mar-09-10 04:17 PM   #262 
   Complicit, corrupt, corporate concubines  Lorien   Mar-09-10 11:15 AM   #198 
   +1  RufusTFirefly   Mar-09-10 12:02 PM   #205 
   Not just complicit  lark   Mar-09-10 01:08 PM   #222 
   and "complicit" means they would rather lose elections than be progressive.  tomp   Mar-09-10 02:06 PM   #233 
   Succinct.  dchill   Mar-09-10 02:17 PM   #237 
   Neither weaklings nor antiquated --  Mike K   Mar-09-10 12:59 PM   #220 
   This is exactly what they want. Cover. n/t  leftstreet   Mar-08-10 07:02 PM   #11 
   Many of them are corrupt. That's why. They are getting lots of money from lobbyists. nt  Selatius   Mar-08-10 07:18 PM   #17 
   I am sure a lot of money is passed to them in those brown envelopes (under the tables  AlinPA   Mar-08-10 07:21 PM   #19 
   Fast?? WTF  pocoloco   Mar-08-10 09:39 PM   #31 
   No . . they pre-BRIBED and pre-OWNED by corporations . .  defendandprotect   Mar-08-10 11:30 PM   #54 
   Kick  Meeker Morgan   Mar-08-10 07:04 PM   #13 
   This may be the case for Suzanne Kosmas.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-08-10 07:06 PM   #15 
   Hard to argue with the logic  Canuckistanian   Mar-08-10 07:08 PM   #16 
   Kick and rec.  pecwae   Mar-08-10 07:19 PM   #18 
   and the Republicans have done so much  O is 44   Mar-08-10 07:26 PM   #20 
   People seem to like it if you stand for something.  MrSlayer   Mar-08-10 09:04 PM   #26 
   Nail, meet hammer.  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:15 AM   #150 
   Since FDR, the poor have voted for the dems & they're are still poor  bikingaz   Mar-09-10 08:42 PM   #292 
   Exactly. And here's a little proof to back up your statement:  Lorien   Mar-09-10 11:17 AM   #199 
   In large measure, because OUR "leaders" won't go out on the stump, day affer day this fall  Ken Burch   Mar-08-10 11:12 PM   #47 
   it won't be her..she is a distraction..and deliberately so. eom  flyarm   Mar-09-10 12:11 AM   #64 
      Well, whoever it DOES end up being.  Ken Burch   Mar-09-10 12:26 AM   #66 
         I actually heard that reference yesterday on M$NBC. n/t  muffin1   Mar-09-10 09:32 AM   #183 
   Not the point of politics anymore  ProudToBeBlueInRhody   Mar-09-10 12:56 AM   #75 
   K&R and thanks for the post and link.  inna   Mar-08-10 07:28 PM   #21 
   Remember what Carlin said. nt  Enthusiast   Mar-09-10 02:54 AM   #127 
   kick  G_j   Mar-08-10 08:21 PM   #22 
   k&r  Little Star   Mar-08-10 08:24 PM   #23 
   thank you!  dana_bDU Moderator   Mar-08-10 08:35 PM   #24 
   It seems to be what they want.  MrSlayer   Mar-08-10 09:00 PM   #25 
   Oh I don't know - they might actually be worth a bucket of piss.  truedelphi   Mar-09-10 03:26 AM   #132 
   Wo.. What's Lemmy gonna do with that sheep?  Prof Lester   Mar-09-10 10:56 AM   #194 
   the only reason dems would lose nov is same as 94- dems ignoring talk radio  certainot   Mar-08-10 09:24 PM   #27 
   Obama's not ignoring it- he spoke to the Chamber of Commerce last week and took a swipe at teachers  depakid   Mar-08-10 09:33 PM   #30 
   Thats what I told "Centrist" Democratic President Bill Clinton...  bvar22   Mar-08-10 09:54 PM   #36 
      Funny you'd mention that...  depakid   Mar-08-10 10:34 PM   #42 
      lol! and they say HCR is all that and more! oh, when will we ever learn...  scentopine   Mar-08-10 11:17 PM   #48 
      Say it's not so!  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:19 AM   #151 
      +1  leeroysphitz   Mar-09-10 12:20 PM   #213 
      The Telecommunication Deregulation Act of 1996 is why I no longer have a job in radio.  OnyxCollie   Mar-08-10 11:19 PM   #49 
         I don't know if Cheap Channel bought my hometown radio station  Art_from_Ark   Mar-09-10 03:35 AM   #138 
   K & R nt  laughingliberal   Mar-08-10 09:29 PM   #29 
   I do hope you come back and brag about it to all of us,  cliffordu   Mar-08-10 09:44 PM   #33 
   Whereas the inverse is not true....  KonaKane   Mar-08-10 09:48 PM   #34 
   No, the difference is there are no R's that act like D's.  jeff47   Mar-08-10 11:30 PM   #55 
   +1 nt  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 01:20 AM   #96 
   the inverse rarely occurs...  0rganism   Mar-09-10 02:44 PM   #242 
      I haven't seen you here in something like a million years.  stevedeshazer   Mar-11-10 12:48 AM   #317 
         i know, i haven't posted much lately  0rganism   Mar-11-10 12:55 AM   #318 
   No shit!  lonestarnot   Mar-08-10 09:50 PM   #35 
   K&R  Faryn Balyncd   Mar-08-10 10:18 PM   #37 
   He wanted to be the last President to deal with HCR.  Mithreal   Mar-08-10 10:23 PM   #38 
   I think you should check the date of your Sinclair Lewis quote  Art_from_Ark   Mar-09-10 02:45 AM   #123 
      .  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 02:58 AM   #128 
         Fixed  Oilwellian   Mar-09-10 01:03 PM   #221 
            .  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:26 PM   #249 
   Yep  Kall   Mar-08-10 10:23 PM   #39 
   They're big into recycling. That $500,000,000,000 is return on investment.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 12:45 AM   #72 
   Strong, passionate leadership early on would have helped a lot. Instead we got ......  Stinky The Clown   Mar-08-10 10:28 PM   #40 
   DINOBAMA  lark   Mar-09-10 02:08 PM   #234 
   There will be NO "Fixing it Later". K&R That. All these shills will  SlingBlade   Mar-08-10 10:32 PM   #41 
   dem leadership is doubling down on republicanism - its going to be ugly -nt  scentopine   Mar-08-10 10:49 PM   #44 
   ++ NeoConservative = NeoLiberal = NeoFascist. Milton Friedman is dancing in HELL nt  glitch   Mar-09-10 12:02 PM   #206 
   No problem. It's what RAHM wants.  Octafish   Mar-08-10 10:52 PM   #45 
   I think more Republicans in the House and Senate fits in perfectly with Rahm's plans.  laughingliberal   Mar-08-10 11:34 PM   #57 
      If I wanted GOP government, I'd vote for GOP candidates.  Octafish   Mar-09-10 12:29 AM   #67 
         .  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 12:54 AM   #74 
   Recommended -- these are the reasons  Mira   Mar-08-10 11:05 PM   #46 
   True, but the blood bath will mostly hit DLCers (especially if we progressives make sure to protect  w4rma   Mar-08-10 11:19 PM   #50 
   Agree 1000% . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Mar-08-10 11:31 PM   #56 
   Agreed! (nt)  w4rma   Mar-08-10 11:40 PM   #58 
   Unfortunately, it will be the Progressives who also pay the price.  bvar22   Mar-09-10 12:01 AM   #62 
   Progressives have the most popular position. The most outspoken progressive in the House is winning  w4rma   Mar-09-10 12:16 AM   #65 
   +1 If they will ignore their Dem Leadership and their dollars.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:34 AM   #103 
   Answer - do not give the DLC the time of day  lark   Mar-09-10 02:14 PM   #235 
   Correct. nt  Enthusiast   Mar-09-10 02:58 AM   #129 
   Yup (nt)  Dinger   Mar-08-10 11:20 PM   #51 
   MEDICARE FOR ALL -- no more expensive than what we're paying now . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-08-10 11:28 PM   #52 
   How can we call them "Democrats" when they're supporting Bush wars and  defendandprotect   Mar-08-10 11:29 PM   #53 
   Sorry to interrupt this little echo chamber...  SanchoPanza   Mar-08-10 11:43 PM   #59 
   Excellent post. n/t  ProSense   Mar-08-10 11:59 PM   #61 
   Making private health care mandatory for Americans will cause health insurers to be awash in  hulka38   Mar-09-10 12:34 AM   #70 
   No it isn't.  SanchoPanza   Mar-10-10 12:14 AM   #309 
   correct me if I am wrong but it was in the NE where NJ lost a dem governor to a repub..and then  flyarm   Mar-09-10 12:34 AM   #71 
   Given the mood of the public -- the desire for liberal/progressive movement ... especially re  defendandprotect   Mar-09-10 12:56 AM   #76 
   What happened in the NE is an anamoly, a 2 REALLY REALLY bad candidates  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:07 AM   #83 
   Yes, polls be damned.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:12 AM   #87 
   Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Mar-09-10 01:15 AM   #89 
   Oh Please..NJ was not an anomaly! save it! eom  flyarm   Mar-09-10 01:22 PM   #224 
   Special elections are the height of local politics  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 10:14 PM   #296 
   And this time around, there wasn't any gun legislation  KingFlorez   Mar-09-10 12:50 AM   #73 
   If you don't understand the arguments, don't pretend to be an authority.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:02 AM   #78 
   FUCK FACTS !!!! /sarcasm  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:06 AM   #82 
   Them thar sure are perty facts.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:11 AM   #86 
      The bill triples CHC's,  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:16 AM   #92 
         The "bill" has some good things, no shit? Of course it does.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:21 AM   #97 
         "some"...do you need the list again or can you outline 5 of those "good" things?  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:29 AM   #102 
            I believe the negatives outweigh the good with a couple exceptions.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:35 AM   #104 
               FYI: Kucinich couldn't name 5 things either, the list has been out long enough for those who WANT to  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:45 AM   #106 
                  .  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:59 AM   #114 
                     Thanks for that image!  pnorman   Mar-09-10 11:26 AM   #201 
                        Have at it, challenge the discussion. May the more persuasive angle prevail.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 02:52 PM   #243 
                           I already did with this:  pnorman   Mar-09-10 10:54 PM   #303 
                              Unsure if I understand that  Mithreal   Mar-10-10 12:03 AM   #307 
         We don't need to pass the Senate Bill...  bvar22   Mar-09-10 12:08 PM   #209 
   Uh as far as your last sentence, Marcie Angell understands  truedelphi   Mar-09-10 03:28 AM   #133 
   an excellent point, which sanchopanza has yet to address. nt  tomp   Mar-09-10 02:15 PM   #236 
   PNHP has it's own agenda.  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 10:22 PM   #298 
      If I wasn't in the forty nine to sixty two year old age frame that is seriously  truedelphi   Mar-09-10 10:34 PM   #300 
         I'm in favor of the removal of the anti-trust exemption as well.  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 11:31 PM   #306 
   What I understand it the community ratings system in the Senate bill  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:28 AM   #152 
   Thank you - that is a very important point, and one that  truedelphi   Mar-09-10 07:34 PM   #285 
   It's not pure community rating.  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 10:34 PM   #301 
   Great post ... we have too many chicken littles running around now ...  JoePhilly   Mar-09-10 08:01 AM   #171 
   Yes, "pass anything" is such a winner. Wtf are you talking about?  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:32 PM   #250 
      Where did I say "pass anything" ??  JoePhilly   Mar-09-10 09:43 PM   #294 
         JP, it is hardly a leap to infer what I did. No trouble mischaracterizing my POV though.  Mithreal   Mar-10-10 12:38 AM   #310 
   I think you are misreading that data  kenfrequed   Mar-09-10 10:32 AM   #191 
   All very irrelevant.  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 10:52 PM   #302 
   We refuse to engage in your corrupt framing of the argument - this is NOT about MLR or CR's. It's  grahamhgreen   Mar-09-10 02:03 PM   #232 
   +1 well said  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:33 PM   #251 
   I refuse to engage in your ill-informed framing of the argument! Har!  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 11:04 PM   #304 
      Then we agree we need a non-profit public plan included before we pass this bill, like Medicare!  grahamhgreen   Mar-11-10 12:25 AM   #314 
         Not really.  SanchoPanza   Mar-11-10 08:21 PM   #320 
            The real contention is 45,000 people are killed by big insurance every year and the S bill floods  grahamhgreen   Mar-12-10 01:36 PM   #321 
               Again, no.  SanchoPanza   Mar-12-10 04:41 PM   #322 
   You seem to think the exchanges are good valid entities???  lark   Mar-09-10 02:22 PM   #239 
   Oooh well why don't you educate us on "Community Ratings" and "Medical Loss Ratios"  walldude   Mar-09-10 02:38 PM   #241 
      Sure thing.  SanchoPanza   Mar-09-10 11:23 PM   #305 
   Yep  colsohlibgal   Mar-08-10 11:49 PM   #60 
   Oh Thank you for posting this bvar22, I have no doubt it will be a blood bath..the big question is  flyarm   Mar-09-10 12:08 AM   #63 
   From The Pen: The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:05 AM   #79 
      That's what I've been thinking since about August.  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:38 AM   #155 
      The majorities were too much pressure.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:16 AM   #163 
      Yes, I have often thought that the Dems deliberately threw the elections of '84 and '88  Lydia Leftcoast   Mar-09-10 12:19 PM   #212 
         Okay... I'm Almost A Complete Cynic & Believe Certain Realities, But What I Want  ChiciB1   Mar-09-10 02:02 PM   #231 
            My tactic will be to support challengers in the primaries  Lydia Leftcoast   Mar-09-10 02:26 PM   #240 
            In My VERY RED County With A VERY Blue Dog Democratic Party It Has  ChiciB1   Mar-09-10 05:31 PM   #269 
            Encourage people to get involved locally and in state politics.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:12 PM   #246 
               Just Made A Few Comments Above... But I Do Understand Your Strategy  ChiciB1   Mar-09-10 05:40 PM   #272 
                  It's alright. You are not alone. I am surrounded by Blue Dogs reps.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:12 PM   #276 
                     Yes, It's Warming Up Nicely Here Now & I Too Enjoy My Gardening!  ChiciB1   Mar-10-10 11:47 AM   #312 
   K&R  Odin2005   Mar-09-10 12:29 AM   #68 
   Thank you  Chulanowa   Mar-09-10 12:31 AM   #69 
   On the State level as well.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:05 AM   #81 
   We know this. Why don't the leaders? k*r  autorank   Mar-09-10 01:00 AM   #77 
   We have given many of these "leaders" little reason to fear us.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:10 AM   #85 
   Not rightly so. Obama made history in 2008, and the racists are trying to stop him from making more.  newtothegame   Mar-09-10 01:05 AM   #80 
   Will you come and gladly admit you were wrong if not 'Blood Bath' occurs? TIA  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:09 AM   #84 
   There shouldn't even be a blood bath.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:15 AM   #90 
   OP claims there will be blood bath and if wrong I would like to know if they would GLADLY admit it  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:19 AM   #94 
      Do you really think the op thinks he or she is Nostra-fucking-damus?  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:24 AM   #99 
         yes  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:27 AM   #101 
   YES!  bvar22   Mar-09-10 12:37 PM   #216 
   So we don't have a party anymore?  earcandle   Mar-09-10 01:13 AM   #88 
   There are some who are going to not vote and then complain loudly  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:19 AM   #95 
   There are some who are going to bash on the liberal members of the party from now until November and  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 01:36 AM   #105 
   If this "charm" stopped someone from doing anything then most likely they weren't going to vote in..  uponit7771   Mar-09-10 01:46 AM   #108 
      I pause a little before voting for people who tell me to STFU  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 02:14 AM   #120 
   There are some who are boots on the ground NOW and will "complain" loudly  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 01:46 AM   #107 
   A thousand times this.  Arkana   Mar-09-10 10:29 AM   #189 
   Let's see if I have the rules straight  GinaMaria   Mar-09-10 11:41 AM   #202 
      Oh, "they" extend it to actual boots on the ground types too  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:24 PM   #248 
      True, dat.  earcandle   Mar-10-10 10:35 PM   #313 
   We have a party, and it is about the Big Boys and Girls at the Top  truedelphi   Mar-09-10 03:31 AM   #136 
   The absoulte worst thing that could have happened was what  SlingBlade   Mar-09-10 01:22 AM   #98 
   When we make fun of average American Republicans voting against their interests  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 02:10 AM   #118 
      Yep, Though I'm not personally a Union Member, I know that  SlingBlade   Mar-09-10 10:18 AM   #188 
   knr - shakes head that the Dems are promoting this mandate. n/t  slipslidingaway   Mar-09-10 01:47 AM   #109 
   Turning your back to your = political suicide  AzNick   Mar-09-10 01:48 AM   #110 
   Recommend  xchrom   Mar-09-10 01:56 AM   #113 
   I agree. k/r  FourScore   Mar-09-10 02:01 AM   #115 
   This is what I have been saying--the worst bloodbath in the history of the US!  emsimon33   Mar-09-10 02:09 AM   #117 
   K&R.  David Zephyr   Mar-09-10 02:13 AM   #119 
   We all know what is happening, we have been taken for a ride.  ooglymoogly   Mar-09-10 02:15 AM   #121 
   k&r  jannyk   Mar-09-10 02:47 AM   #124 
   You say America will rightly  Enthusiast   Mar-09-10 02:51 AM   #125 
   Even both brands.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:06 AM   #131 
   CORRECT  Skittles   Mar-09-10 03:00 AM   #130 
   Hooray!!!!! The Democrats are going to lose!!!! Yay!!!! Yippie!!!!!! Good for us!!!!  Hamlette   Mar-09-10 03:29 AM   #134 
   Dean? Did you forget to take your meds?  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:32 AM   #137 
   My bad. I forgot. Today is "Dennis is a God" day. Dennis knows everything.  Hamlette   Mar-09-10 05:06 AM   #149 
      Sure he isn't still anti-choice, just more dishonest about it?  suzie   Mar-09-10 05:35 AM   #154 
      amusing, these diversions, but very silly  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:04 AM   #159 
         Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-09-10 05:11 PM   #267 
            Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-09-10 05:23 PM   #268 
      laughable, if this is the best you can do persuading  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:02 AM   #158 
   That subject line - rofl!  Skip Intro   Mar-09-10 03:50 AM   #141 
   Sometimes its better to leave comedy to the professionals.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:08 AM   #143 
      what?  Skip Intro   Mar-09-10 04:14 AM   #144 
         Some people say the cucumbers taste better pickled.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:15 AM   #145 
            rofl - damn that's funny!!!  Skip Intro   Mar-09-10 04:17 AM   #146 
               not funny, but as relevant?  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:05 AM   #160 
   You seem to think we are not going to invade Iran with the Democrats in power. nt  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:45 AM   #156 
      Encircling Iran with mega-bases isn't just for show.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:29 AM   #164 
   Would it be better than what we have now? nt  Skip Intro   Mar-09-10 03:31 AM   #135 
   Ask the DLC New Dem coalition types.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:40 AM   #139 
   I don't believe any of this bullshit. The GOP will be at least as hard hit as the Dems in November.  old mark   Mar-09-10 03:46 AM   #140 
   That is rich.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:58 AM   #142 
   Yes, that inspiring 'centrist' message will surely win the electorate over  laughingliberal   Mar-09-10 05:49 AM   #157 
      If the centrist message was so appealing, the wannabes wouldn't find it so challenging, defending it  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:11 AM   #161 
   there are only 2 choices my friend  mdmc   Mar-09-10 06:47 AM   #166 
      We will see in November....I hope some of these assholes recall who they  old mark   Mar-09-10 11:05 AM   #196 
         -1  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:42 PM   #252 
   K&R n/t  Shining Jack   Mar-09-10 06:34 AM   #165 
   So the voters are pissed because the Dems/Obama  twitomy   Mar-09-10 06:48 AM   #167 
   +1 Looks about right.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 07:06 AM   #168 
   Thanks but this was a quick hit and  twitomy   Mar-09-10 08:02 PM   #289 
      a good contribution nonetheless, alrighty, have a good one  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 08:20 PM   #291 
   You are assuming that...  sendero   Mar-09-10 09:50 AM   #184 
      Yes, There is  twitomy   Mar-09-10 08:00 PM   #288 
         I don't think the independents..  sendero   Mar-09-10 08:15 PM   #290 
            Independents are a fickle bunch, no doubt.  twitomy   Mar-09-10 09:32 PM   #293 
   Let us hope that...  DisgustedInMN   Mar-09-10 07:26 AM   #169 
   Yes, but IMO, the tension between the Democrats and Republicans is so severe now  AlinPA   Mar-09-10 10:04 PM   #295 
   Right. Mandates subsidizing private profits are bad policy.  moondust   Mar-09-10 08:02 AM   #172 
   Wow, so Dean actually agrees with Kucinich then. Good to hear. eom  NorthCarolina   Mar-09-10 08:04 AM   #173 
   So did Bill Maher and Michael Moore  Bryn   Mar-11-10 12:46 AM   #316 
   Here's why lobbyists have power and YOU don't  western mass   Mar-09-10 08:08 AM   #174 
   I know a lot of Democrats that will disagree with you.  SandWalker1984   Mar-09-10 12:05 PM   #207 
   momentum has shifted...five weeks too late  lxlxlxl   Mar-09-10 08:18 AM   #175 
   K AND R!  pleah   Mar-09-10 08:21 AM   #177 
   Long way to go.. 6 months is an eternity in politics..  DCBob   Mar-09-10 08:26 AM   #178 
   Gee, anyone want to re-think their primary vote? That guy  pokercat999   Mar-09-10 08:35 AM   #179 
   Really hope you're being sarcastic  Arkana   Mar-09-10 10:30 AM   #190 
      Yes.  bvar22   Mar-09-10 12:16 PM   #211 
      +1 Funny that  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:44 PM   #253 
      Ha! Very Funny!  Bryn   Mar-11-10 02:19 AM   #319 
   You're right  varelse   Mar-09-10 08:55 AM   #180 
   very simple, don't reward failure.  NuttyFluffers   Mar-09-10 09:12 AM   #181 
   We need to create a viable Third Party. The right has it's teabaggers  Lorien   Mar-09-10 11:25 AM   #200 
   We really got screwed by this president. I wont forget this. n/t  leeroysphitz   Mar-09-10 09:23 AM   #182 
   For who? certainly not the independents.. before you cut off your nose to spite your face  Peacetrain   Mar-09-10 09:55 AM   #185 
   +1000  icee   Mar-09-10 09:57 AM   #186 
   K&R  Yuugal   Mar-09-10 10:17 AM   #187 
   Obama isn't stupid nor reckless politically imo, I doubt he has much concern  Jefferson23   Mar-09-10 10:33 AM   #192 
   It used to be capitalists swore they could run government like a business  KansDem   Mar-09-10 10:37 AM   #193 
   The 'take home' message  Zambero   Mar-09-10 11:02 AM   #195 
   "There's not a dime's worth of difference between.....  pnorman   Mar-09-10 11:14 AM   #197 
   Democrat = Republican  Goldstein1984   Mar-09-10 11:46 AM   #203 
   Someone, somewhere, better fill in President Obama on this.....  BrklynLiberal   Mar-09-10 11:54 AM   #204 
   Hard to say. We don't really know how the election machines will be programmed. nt  glitch   Mar-09-10 12:06 PM   #208 
   If it meant that issue would be addressed, I wonder if Ed Shultz wasn't right about voting 10 times  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:05 PM   #257 
      We don't need to actually do it, how about we just say that we can do it.  glitch   Mar-09-10 07:31 PM   #284 
         Too true.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 07:34 PM   #286 
   k and r  femrap   Mar-09-10 12:13 PM   #210 
   So what are you doing about it?  county worker   Mar-09-10 12:20 PM   #214 
   +1 The question for each of us.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:05 PM   #258 
   Emphatic K&R!!!!  Kermitt Gribble   Mar-09-10 12:37 PM   #215 
   Depends...2010 won't be so bad if we GOTV  Taverner   Mar-09-10 12:42 PM   #217 
   who are you going to call for GOTV?? The unions..nope they have been fucked ..  flyarm   Mar-09-10 01:27 PM   #225 
   So you're not voting then...  Taverner   Mar-09-10 01:27 PM   #226 
   I will vote for local stuff..but not for any dem candidate ..they have fucked we lifelong dems long  flyarm   Mar-09-10 01:35 PM   #227 
   What flyarm Said  Dinger   Mar-09-10 03:11 PM   #245 
   The Obama campaign here in WA state did their best to corrupt GOTV  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:09 PM   #259 
   not necessarily  Lord Helmet   Mar-09-10 12:52 PM   #218 
   If you are especially careful about mischaracterizing others arguments  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:11 PM   #260 
      not buying into the "blood bath" hyperbole -- characterizing it as such is horseshit  Lord Helmet   Mar-09-10 04:24 PM   #264 
         You don't have to buy it for it to be a warning.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:30 PM   #265 
            Well I don't lose any sleep over people sniveling on the interweb.  Lord Helmet   Mar-09-10 05:33 PM   #271 
               Characterizing as sniveling  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:00 PM   #274 
                  It's a lifetime between now and November.  Lord Helmet   Mar-09-10 06:21 PM   #280 
                     To each his own. I think I can appreciate your position even if not entirely agree.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:25 PM   #281 
   And I'm sure you'll enjoy every second.  Arkana   Mar-09-10 12:57 PM   #219 
   -1  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:14 PM   #261 
   K&R  Eyerish   Mar-09-10 01:11 PM   #223 
   If so it's because the goddamned centrists and the goddamned progressives won't quit bickering  jobycom   Mar-09-10 01:41 PM   #228 
   Lots of DLCicious spin there, but agreed with some of the sentiment, IF  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:21 PM   #263 
   "He was the best progressive president this nation had after FDR."  Hell Hath No Fury   Mar-09-10 06:29 PM   #282 
      Poor Bill.  bvar22   Mar-09-10 07:10 PM   #283 
      Don't forget Telecommuncations Act of 1996  ibegurpard   Mar-09-10 10:27 PM   #299 
         I forgot about that.  Hell Hath No Fury   Mar-10-10 11:17 AM   #311 
   We won't lose the house  skyounkin   Mar-09-10 01:49 PM   #229 
   The Thing that's Truly UNBELIEVABLE Is That THEY Know What We're  ChiciB1   Mar-09-10 01:52 PM   #230 
   solution: third party, mass movement. nt  tomp   Mar-09-10 02:20 PM   #238 
      Actually, New Dems, you know, Third Way'ers, have created a Third Party.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 04:42 PM   #266 
   Ignorant bullshit  HughMoran   Mar-09-10 03:05 PM   #244 
   Very persuasive  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 03:45 PM   #254 
      I thought so  HughMoran   Mar-09-10 03:46 PM   #255 
   "blame the Democratic Party" - Indeed. n/t  davidwparker   Mar-09-10 03:52 PM   #256 
   Assuming you are right, we will all simply become survivalists, and it will be looking out only  Mike 03   Mar-09-10 06:04 PM   #275 
   America is already the nation of You're On Your Own.  Mithreal   Mar-09-10 06:17 PM   #279 
   BLANCHE!!!  Supersedeas   Mar-09-10 06:13 PM   #277 
   Go Howard!!!  sgalindez   Mar-09-10 06:16 PM   #278 
   K&R n/t  OhioChick   Mar-09-10 07:41 PM   #287 
   If Howard Dean had to cast a vote for this HCR plan, he would vote AYE!!  ncteechur   Mar-09-10 10:15 PM   #297 
   -1  Mithreal   Mar-10-10 12:05 AM   #308 
   I'm all for it.  RagAss   Mar-11-10 12:29 AM   #315 
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
111. Sadly
Democrats are paid with the same money, to do mostly the same things as Republicans.

Until we can manage to cut off the spigot of money, into campaigns, lobbyists doing favors, before, and after they "serve" (themselves, pretty much) we'll have a political system of legalized bribery.

I understand why Rangel, Stevens, Jefferson, and others have trouble finding the line of demarkation from legal, to illegal, when you consider all the ways money can be paid to them, perfectly legally. It must get confusing.

I'm just thinking of Bullworth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Somebody read that to Obama. Quick.
Sometimes you get the feeling that he just doesn't care. Surely he is bright enough to know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son Of Wendigo (70 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
147. He knows...
He just doesn't give a crap. He is so busy kissing smelly repug ass he has lost sight of the majority of Americans who supported him. He won by over 9 million votes. If he had given half the attention he gives to the repugs to his base and his supporters, he and the Democratic Party would be flying high now. For one thing, we would have meaningful health care reform months ago that would have gutted big insurance and big pharma instead of the craptaceous bills coming his way now which benefit no one, except of course big insurance and big pharma.

In 2012, if he is given permission by the repugs to run, he'll be lucky to survive the primaries. I wouldn't vote for him again. In 2010 he will likely lose both houses of congress. We'll see what he has to say about bipartisanship then. But he will still not give a crap. He'll have the $28 million he got from big insurance to guarantee that nothing threatens their billions to keep him warm. After all, he is just another politician selling out America for the rich guys' money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #147
176. The cynic in me
says that he's going to use a Repuke majority in both sides of Congress as a springboard for his own election. He's got to figure that Congress is always going to be a despised institution, and any dysfunction between January, 2011 and November, 2012 can be blamed on a Rethug Congress that isn't giving him anything to work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #147
270. smelly repug ass
Large ones like boil on the ass Limpballs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #270
273. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalOne65 (98 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
148. He cares.
If he doesn't pass anything, he an the left wing of the party lose their jobs in 2012. If he passes this bill, the right wing and centrist of the party lose in 2010, but he keeps his job in 2012. To him it doesn't matter anymore what is in the bill. He needs to pass it, or he will appear like he can't control the party. Political science 101, save your own job before everybody else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #148
153. Left wing? There is only Dennis and one or two there, everyone else is talk Left-vote Corporate
Except for the few willing to both talk and vote corporate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #153
162. updating whipcongress list, willing to cut these ones a lil slack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #153
247. You apparently arent part of the left wing of the Party, so what do you support that
makes you different than the left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and Rec. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is amazing how things changed so fast. The Democrats in Congress are weaklings. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not weaklings -- just antiquated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not weaklings, not antiquatedUpdated at 11:19 PM
Complicit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. complicity begets weakness
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 07:10 PM by G_j
the game is unsustainable (antiquated)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. That's it exactly
Complicit.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed (0 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
91. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #91
100. Calling your fellow DU'ers T-Baggers is pathetic, even moronic.
How old are you? Maybe I should be less harsh, you know, if you are a kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #100
112. I called no one a T baggers, just made sure they are saying the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #112
116. .
I stand corrected? Maybe. That was a lil unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
93. TERRIFIED OF THE REPUBLICAN SLIME MACHINES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
122. You beat me to it!
Yep, that would be the reason I've become disgusted with the Democrats - this much incompetence can't be blamed on incompetence. It's collusion, complicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
126. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
170. They are indeed complicit
as well as weaklings and antiquated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #170
262. I will say it in a more working class way
they are mostly assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
198. Complicit, corrupt, corporate concubines
The New Right Wing(to the Right of every administration before Reagan), while the repugs have turned themselves into a party of illiterate Fascist Authoritarians. At this point both the Left and the Right just need a fresh start with entirely new parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
205. +1
Amazes me how many people wring their hands over supposed Democratic "incompetence" or "weakness."

Note to handwringers:

THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THEY ARE SERVING THEIR CORPORATE CONSTITUENTS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
222. Not just complicit
but sold out 100% to the military/industrial/bigpharma lobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
233. and "complicit" means they would rather lose elections than be progressive.
it's past time for progressives to leave the democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
237. Succinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike K Donating Member (539 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
220. Neither weaklings nor antiquated --
Corrupt!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. This is exactly what they want. Cover. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Many of them are corrupt. That's why. They are getting lots of money from lobbyists. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I am sure a lot of money is passed to them in those brown envelopes (under the tables
of those expensive DC restaurants).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Fast?? WTF
How long is your "fast"





Inquiring minds would like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
54. No . . they pre-BRIBED and pre-OWNED by corporations . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan (971 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. This may be the case for Suzanne Kosmas.
I don't think any Democrat that this county can produce, is going to beat out Adams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hard to argue with the logic
Based on past performance of Congress and the Senate and the bill (as it is) before them, I don't see any "reform" in the letters "HCR".

It's more like "HCT" - Health Care Tinkering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick and rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 (740 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. and the Republicans have done so much
in the way of helping us out of all these problems. (NOT) So why again are they an automatic shoo-in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. People seem to like it if you stand for something.
The Republicans are a cancer for the country but they don't make any bones about it. They stand for things and support them, however bad those things may be. The Democrats pretend they are for the people but never back it up with action so they don't seem to stand for anything. They look like the spineless weasels they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
150. Nail, meet hammer.
That is it, exactly. People want to know their leaders stand for something. How many voters believe Obama did not campaign on a public option? Even if they are not in favor of a public option, does it look principled to deny he campaigned on it when most people heard it with their own ears? Anything would have been better than saying that. It does not evoke feelings of trust. And most Americans vote their feelings and their pocketbooks. Their pocketbooks are a lost cause, right now. So, inspiring some trust would not have been a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikingaz (110 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #150
292. Since FDR, the poor have voted for the dems & they're are still poor
So much for helping the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
199. Exactly. And here's a little proof to back up your statement:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. In large measure, because OUR "leaders" won't go out on the stump, day affer day this fall
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 11:13 PM by Ken Burch
And CALL THEIR BLOATED POMPOUS ARROGANT ASSES OUT on it.

We could blow these guys out of the water on this it we tried, but our gutless wonders in the leadership just won't do it.

Just like, if Palin does get in in 2012, the same gutless wonders will insist that whatever pitiful remnant remains of our congressional representation "will owe it to the country" to pass everything she wants, like they did with Reagan in the Eighties and Dubbikins for the last eight cowardly years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #47
64. it won't be her..she is a distraction..and deliberately so. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. Well, whoever it DOES end up being.
BTW...does anyone else expect we're going to start seeing references to the "New Romney" in the MSM sometime soon?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #66
183. I actually heard that reference yesterday on M$NBC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
75. Not the point of politics anymore
It's to stand around and let the other guy fuck up. Let's be honest, did many Dems really work for it in 2006, or did they just stand back and let the scandals do the work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R and thanks for the post and link.

My fear is an upcoming "entitlement reform" in the Republican-controlled congress - some kind of an atrocity that Reagan/Bushies/Gingrich Repubs didn't even dream about being able to get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
127. Remember what Carlin said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. thank you!
I've read many of your posts and you always say it like it is. Some say it's repetitive but it's no b.s. The Dems have the biggest majority they have had in years and they can't get it done now. So HOW in the hell would this p.o.s. get "fixed" later?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. It seems to be what they want.
If they really wanted to retain power they would do what the people want but they, with few exceptions, honestly don't want to help the people at the expense of the corporate masters. They don't care about us. It's easier to feign outrage when the Republicans push the agenda they really support. The game is rigged and neither party is worth a bucket of piss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
132. Oh I don't know - they might actually be worth a bucket of piss.
But not a teaspoon of piss more than that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prof Lester (92 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
194. Wo.. What's Lemmy gonna do with that sheep?
Barbecue 'im?? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot (617 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. the only reason dems would lose nov is same as 94- dems ignoring talk radio
while the right launders GOP and chamber of commerce and lobbyist talking points through 1000 coordinated UNCONTESTED radio stations with an often captive audience the size of the one that voted for obama.

year after year the left ignores that they have the biggest soapbox in history and they use it to dominate all framing and messaging.

dems can win big if they start picketing the main limbaugh stations that do the heavy lifting on the obstruction and which are now determining many state level primaries- who's too progressive in the dem primaries and whos not insane enough on the right. make the obstructionist dems choose between limbaugh and obama/america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Obama's not ignoring it- he spoke to the Chamber of Commerce last week and took a swipe at teachers
but as far as media divestment, de-consolidation and re-regulation is concerned, the chances of that are about even more remote than effective Wall Street reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Thats what I told "Centrist" Democratic President Bill Clinton...
...when he signed the "Telecommunications Act" de-regulating Media Ownership in 1996 to "encourage competition".
.
.
.
.
I was right then too.


"...the deregulations have led to a concentration of media ownership with fewer broadcasters competing in regional markets and the elimination of many local, independent and alternative media outlets."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_...


Whenever a "Centrist" Democrat tell you that they are going to "encourage competition", you had better hide your wallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Funny you'd mention that...
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 10:34 PM by depakid
The pitch at the time was that it would lower cable rates and increase competition!

Those of us familiar with and who worked on the issue knew and warned about what would happen.

Cable rates in our neck of the woods shot up 30% with a year and local radio stations went generic and conglomerate, leaving up and coming artists out of the mix. Hell, we even got payola back! Yay for deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. lol! and they say HCR is all that and more! oh, when will we ever learn...
I am starting to think these centrists are not operating in our best interests... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #48
151. Say it's not so!
The 'centrists' don't have our best interests at heart?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
213. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. The Telecommunication Deregulation Act of 1996 is why I no longer have a job in radio.
After Cheap Channel was able to go hog wild, buying up all the radio stations, bleeding them dry and tossing them aside like used Kleenex.

So much for diversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #49
138. I don't know if Cheap Channel bought my hometown radio station
but I recently found out that the local radio station I often listened to as a kid who had just discovered radio, has now gone the way of the dinosaur, just as the local newspaper has. "Tossing them away like used kleenex"... that pretty much sums it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. I do hope you come back and brag about it to all of us,
if it happens. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Whereas the inverse is not true....
When given the choice between a Democrat and a Republican who acts like a Democrat, the voters will choose the Republican.

Sorry, as much as I hate this, it appears to be the political dynamic in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 (427 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. No, the difference is there are no R's that act like D's.
Because the R's, even "RINOs", understand what a spine is and how to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #55
96. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
242. the inverse rarely occurs...
...because the Republican who acts like a Democrat is nixed during the primaries.

The time of the liberal Republican came and went, they've whittled the party down to their conservative core.

OTOH, "big tent" Democrats are always willing to move to the corporatist "center" while pandering to the gullible base. Democrats have been cowed into supposing we must triangulate to win, and Republicans have come to understand that compromise is not the way to generate momentum behind movement politics.

My prediction: Democrats will maintain slimmer control over both houses in 2010, by representing a tenuous coalition of liberals and those who remember just how lousy the bush years really were. Meantime, the Republicans will be building up their base and getting a huge warchest of corporate money ready to go. 2010 doesn't worry me so much, but 2012 is going to be scary as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar-11-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #242
317. I haven't seen you here in something like a million years.
Dude!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar-11-10 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #317
318. i know, i haven't posted much lately
used to be a regular, now I just circulate on the margins of the edge of the perimeter.

But that sort of happened to you for a while, too, no?

Methinks it may be high time to call for another PDX-area DU meetup at some microbrewery TBD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. No shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R


:hi:



:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. He wanted to be the last President to deal with HCR.
Maybe he can be the last President to deal with all issues as we watch the nation collapse around us. Neat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
123. I think you should check the date of your Sinclair Lewis quote
1835 was a little before Lewis' time.
But 1935 would coincide with the date of his book, "It Can't Happen Here". :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #123
128. .
:hi:

Arggh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #128
221. Fixed
Because it's such a great quote. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #221
249. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kall (23 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yep
Marcia Angell on Bill Moyers' Show:

<www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03052010/watch3.html |DCScripts>

BILL MOYERS: So, has President Obama been fighting as hard as you wished?

MARCIA ANGELL: Fighting for the wrong things and too little, too late. He gave away the store at the very beginning by compromising. Not just compromising, but caving in to the commercial insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry. And then he stood back for months while the thing just fell apart. Now he's fighting, but he's fighting for something that shouldn't pass. Won't pass and shouldn't pass.

What this bill does is not only permit the commercial insurance industry to remain in place, but it actually expands and cements their position as the lynchpin of health care reform. And these companies they profit by denying health care, not providing health care. And they will be able to charge whatever they like. So if they're regulated in some way and it cuts into their profits, all they have to do is just raise their premiums. And they'll do that.

Not only does it keep them in place, but it pours about 500 billion dollars of public money into these companies over 10 years. And it mandates that people buy these companies' products for whatever they charge. Now that's a recipe for the growth in health care costs, not only to continue, but to skyrocket, to grow even faster.

BILL MOYERS: But given that, why have the insurance companies, health insurance companies been fighting reform so hard?

MARCIA ANGELL: Oh, they haven't fought it very hard, Bill. They really haven't fought it very hard. What they're fighting for is the individual mandate. And if they get that mandate, if everyone does have to buy their commercial products, then they're going to be extremely happy with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #39
72. They're big into recycling. That $500,000,000,000 is return on investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. Strong, passionate leadership early on would have helped a lot. Instead we got ......
.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
234. DINOBAMA
EITHER THAT OR SCARED TO DEATH OBAMA - NOT SURE WHICH BUT LEANING TOWARDS THE FORMER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
41. There will be NO "Fixing it Later". K&R That. All these shills will
disappear into the woodwork when that time comes. Those progressives and liberals who
buy into this will be standing in front of the world with egg on their faces to the
utter delight of these so called Centrist, Blue Dogs and Lieberman Liberals.

I say shit can the fucker, Drive a stake through its Corporate heart and push for REAL
HCR in either the Medicare for all or the Federal Employees Health Insurance program


Democrats will go down in history as supporting this trash and Re-pukes
will use it as a hammer until Jesus come a knock'in.
Anything less than those two options is Bullshit and we all know it.

K&R Great Post :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
44. dem leadership is doubling down on republicanism - its going to be ugly -nt
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 10:51 PM by scentopine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
206. ++ NeoConservative = NeoLiberal = NeoFascist. Milton Friedman is dancing in HELL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. No problem. It's what RAHM wants.Updated at 9:11 AM
And what Rahm wants. Rahm GETS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. I think more Republicans in the House and Senate fits in perfectly with Rahm's plans.
He can quit finding Senators to scapegoat for the move to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #57
67. If I wanted GOP government, I'd vote for GOP candidates.Updated at 9:11 AM
Weird how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #67
74. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. Recommended -- these are the reasons
Dennis K will not vote for the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
50. True, but the blood bath will mostly hit DLCers (especially if we progressives make sure to protect
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 11:20 PM by w4rma
our progressives in Congress!)

Don't waste your money on a DLCer who filibusters with Republicans. They are worthless to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Agree 1000% . . . !!!
In fact, we should be targeting them --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Agreed! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
62. Unfortunately, it will be the Progressives who also pay the price.
The average low information American voter isn't aware that there is a difference between a "Centrist" and a "Progressive" Democrat.

It WILL be "The Democrats forced this down our throats" while Premiums continue to rise and 40 MILLION Americans are FORCED to BUY Health Insurance that MOST will not be able to afford to use (High Deductibles/High CoPay). A few Americans will benefit, but MOST will be unhappy with this bill once they unwrap their NEW Democratic Health Care Package and find a BILL from the For Profit Health Insurance Industry who will be running the WHOLE show.

The most infuriating thing for me was watching the Obama/Democrats over the course of a year slowly give the Republicans almost everything they wanted without forcing the Republicans to take ANY Political Risk.


All the Republicans have to do now is sit back and say, "Yep. We opposed it.

I agree that the ONLY thing we can do is support the Progressives in Primaries.
I live in Arkansas (recent transplant) and was delighted to find that a Progressive (Bill Halter) is challenging Blanche Lincoln.
Imagine my despair after hearing Obama strongly endorsed Blue Dog Blanche Lincoln.

It is very difficult to challenge "Centrist" incumbents in Primaries when the entire might of the "Centrist" Democratic Party Leadership (including Primary funding from the DSCC/DCCC) is ready to steamroll Progressive challengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Progressives have the most popular position. The most outspoken progressive in the House is winning
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 12:16 AM by w4rma
the **Republican** primary as well as the Democratic primary. All progressives have to do is be openly progressive and we'll keep our progressives in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #65
103. +1 If they will ignore their Dem Leadership and their dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #62
235. Answer - do not give the DLC the time of day
and especially do not give them any funding. I used to contribute to all the DSCC, DLC, etc., but no more. I have not nor will I contribute one dime or make one phone call or do anything to support any of these groups. I will contribute individually to Halter, Grayson and their ilk, but the party will get squat because that's what they have been doing over any so called values they allegedly posses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-09-10 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #50
129. Correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
51. Yup (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. MEDICARE FOR ALL -- no more expensive than what we're paying now . . .
per Sen. Bernie Sanders --

And, I'm quite sure that Obama knows that, as well!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-08-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
53. How can we call them "Democrats" when they're supporting Bush wars and
corporate agenda?

It's DLC that needs to be pushed out of this party --

and Rahm Emmanuel pushed out of the White House --

Obama has to make up his mind -- otherwise he can go with them --